![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Printing Instructions To print this page, simultaneously press the "Ctrl" and "P" keys. When the print window opens, press the "O.K." button and your browser will send this document to your default printer. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Engaging Students in Critical Thinking |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This course is designed as a framework
for engaging students in active, critical thinking through
content area subjects within the regular classroom.
As a global society, it is imperative that students
learn to base their thinking on reasoned judgment and elements
of critical thinking. Critical thinking for the purpose of
this course will evolve around the following definitions:
Ennis (1996) critical thinking means reasonable and reflective
thinking focused on deciding what to believe or do. Paul
(2000) critical thinking is that mode of thinking about any
subject, content, or problem in which the thinker improves the
quality of his/her thinking by skillfully taking charge of the
structures inherent in thinking and imposing intellectual
standards upon them.
Some additional givens on critical thinking provide the
base for instructional strategies (Norris, 2000): critical
thinking is sensitive to context, critical thinking looks for
reasoning behind conclusions, critical thinking is an
educational ideal, and to think critically, one must have
knowledge. As Paul states (2005), developing
critical thinkers is central to the mission of all educational
institutions. The
only capacity we can use to learn is human thinking.
If we think well while learning, we learn well.
If we think poorly while learning, we learn poorly.
By ensuring that students learn to think critically and
fair minded, we ensure that students not only master essential
subject matter but also become effective citizens, capable of
reasoning ethically and acting in the public good.
This course
blends theory and practical application so teachers can ready
their students for the lifelong journey of being critical
thinkers. Engaging
Students in Critical Thinking makes a positive difference in
academic levels for students and is rich with material from
experts in the field as baseline resources for curriculum
strategies. Works from Lauren Resnick, Arthur Costa, Robert
Ennis, Robert Marzano, Robert Swartz, Richard Paul, and Robert
Sternberg are but a few of the resources discussed.
“The
real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new
landscapes but in having new eyes” Marcel Proust
Students
will be involved in a variety of tasks for completion of
course requirements: readings, report on readings, exams,
journal and reflection entries, projects related to real world
learning environments, and development of instructional
strategies for specific content areas.
Engaging
Students in Critical Thinking is a 13 week 3 credit graduate
level or sixty hour professional development course taught
online. Modules
1 through 9 will be completed one per week. Module
10 will be completed over a two-week period so students will
have time to revise and complete the final integration project.
Students may use either a Macintosh computer or a PC with
Windows 95 or higher. Students should possess basic word processing
skills and have internet access with an active e-mail account.
Students also are expected to have a basic knowledge of how
to use a Web browser, such as Netscape Navigator, Microsoft
Internet Explorer or America Online's (AOL) browser. To download
a browser at no cost, visit one of the following Web sites
Netscape.com;
Microsoft.com
and AOL.com.
The
required textbook for this course is Developing
Minds: A Resource Book for Teaching Thinking, 3rd
Edition, edited by Arthur L. Costa.
The textbook and course materials will be
provided for all students.
A variety of readings will be referenced throughout
the course. Other
supplemental readings will be provided.
Session Outline
Assignment: Compare the delivery of the content area that you instruct to the thinking and reasoning skills identified from the McREL research. Provide a written analysis of your findings.
Module Two:
Characteristics
of Critical Thinking
Assignment:
Module
Three: Why Teach Critical Thinking?
Assignment: You have been asked to design standards for your content area. Develop three standards related to critical thinking which
need to be part of your content area. In addition to e-mailing this assignment to your instructor, post the three standards to the forum. React to standards developed by one classmate.
Module Four:
Instructional
Strategies for Critical Thinking
Assignments:
Module Five:
Instructional
Model for Critical Thinking
Assignment: Target five Socratic Questions to incorporate into a lesson you will use with your
students. Present the framework for the lesson with the questions. Suggest an anticipated response to each
question.
Module Six: Instructional
Strategies for Transfer of Thinking Skills
Assignment: Complete the activity in the “must see” links regarding cognitive mapping and problem
solving.
Module Seven: Research
and the Use of Specific Critical Thinking Programs
Assignment: Select a critical thinking skills program and
discuss how you will use it in your instruction. Target end goals for the students and provide
an example of the use of the program.
Module
Eight: Creating the Environment
Conducive to Critical Thinking
Assignment: Design a presentation for a group of teachers
in which you target crucial points for sharing from this module. Outline your presentation.
Module Nine:
Addressing Critical Thinking through Various Learning Styles
Assignments: Assignment: Develop a plan to implement the critical thinking skill strategies which
you have learned through this course. Include reflections on the checklist for
critical thinking programs. In your plan describe areas you will target for one year. Also reflect on resources that you will need to implement this plan.
Student Academic Integrity Participants guarantee that all academic class work is original. Any academic dishonesty or plagiarism (to take ideas, writings, etc. from another and offer them as one's own), is a violation of student academic behavior standards as outlined by our partnering colleges and universities and is subject to academic disciplinary action.
Register |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home | Graduate Courses | Professional Development | Class Schedules | Class Login | Course Registration Pay Balance | Join Our Mailing List | Frequently Asked Questions | About TEI | Contact TEI © 2001/2002/2003 Teacher Education Institute. All Rights Reserved. |